Crypto Exchange Solutions

Planning to Build a Crypto Exchange? Here’s How to Choose the Right Crypto Exchange Development Company

Jun 20, 2026 · 13 min read
In this article
Need Help?
Talk to Our Experts

Launching a cryptocurrency exchange platform is a huge investment. Every technical element you incorporate in your platform might influence not only the direction but also the magnitude of your business expansion. 

Only a reputable crypto exchange development company with a track record of successful projects can be a reliable source of effective solutions leading to the launch of secure and scalable trading platforms, which is crucial for long-term success in competitive markets. The outsourcing company that you decide to work with will be the one that characterizes your platform in all aspects of its lifecycle, in other words, from its inception to its deployment and beyond. 

Today’s traders not only want their transactions to be carried out at lightning speed, but they also want the trading environment to be safe and secure. Another reason to choose a top crypto exchange development team is that not only can they help you meet the investors’ demands, but they will also be capable of handling challenges with upgrades, maintenance, and most importantly, compliance. In most cases, firms go after vendors first and foremost based on what the vendors promise in their advertisements. 

The blog elaborates on 10 crucial elements for selecting the right crypto exchange development services provider.

Why Most Founders Fail in Selecting the Right Exchange Development Partner

Many founders ignore extensive research and select a crypto exchange development company based simply on price and appearance.

Surface-Level Feature Evaluation Mistake

This choice often leads to security, scalability, compliance, and performance issues. A lot of companies only look at the product’s design and feature set, overlooking aspects like the performance of the matching engine, liquidity management, the security setup, and the ability to scale.

Demo Platforms Creating False Confidence

Demo platforms present the best-case scenario of trading and the system running perfectly.

Still, real crypto exchange scenarios are subject to fluctuations, liquidity pressures, and numerous users.

Successful cryptocurrency exchange development demands comprehensive technical consideration. Besides architecture, security, liquidity, and scalability, founders also need to evaluate other factors when choosing an exchange development partner.

How a Real Crypto Exchange System Actually Works

Creating a winning crypto exchange website is only possible with a series of interconnected systems. Different building blocks of the platform are trading, liquidity management, security, scalability, and the best user experience.

User Interaction Layer

  • Trading dashboard: This is where users get the latest data about the cryptocurrency market, view their account, and operate trades smoothly. 
  • Order placement interface: Users have the chance here to carry out their orders promptly, with the interface making it as easy as possible.
  • Portfolio visibility systems: Users can check out their portfolio’s performance, view their transaction history, and see if they have made profits.

Trading Execution Layer

  • Matching engine: This is the core of the crypto exchange that matches buyers with sellers immediately without compromising any of the qualities like speed, accuracy, and fairness.
  • Order book processing: The main function of this is to keep the records of the market orders organized while, at the same time, it brings the updates for the LIVE data.
  • Trade execution pipeline: This part of the system is responsible for protecting transaction processes, validating orders, and settling cryptocurrency trades most comfortably.

Infrastructure & Liquidity Layer

  • Liquidity routing systems: Help to swiftly connect liquidity providers to enhance market volume and lessen slippage.
  • Cloud infrastructure scaling: Enables an exchange to increase user capacity by using resources appropriately and achieving high performance.
  • Fault tolerance and recovery systems: Ensure that the trading platform remains operative even in the most adverse situations. 

Gaining familiarity with these layers of exchange architecture is a guide for businesses to pick the best solutions. The right infrastructure works in favor of security, efficiency, scalability, and stability of the platform in the long run.

Unified Vendor Evaluation Framework

Selecting a crypto exchange development company should entail a well-structured evaluation. Instead of multiple overlapping frameworks, vendors must be evaluated using one integrated system. 

Engineering Capability Verification

Check if the cryptocurrency exchange development company truly owns the matching engine, if they can show the backend architecture clearly, and if their system designers can explain the entire system in detail, not just the interfaces.

Scalability Validation

Check out their ability to support high-frequency trading, keep up with stress through capacity limits, and perform low-latency executions even when reaching the highest traffic level.

Security Validation

Discuss the platform safety by reviewing the wallet custody structures, security audit reports, penetration testing results, and platform incident management procedures.

Real-World Proof Validation

Go through the number of end users the partner has, the number of live deployments they have, the volume of active trading, and the credibility of the engineering team.

Implementing a unified evaluation system can a lot lower the risk of deciding on a vendor. It enables companies to find trustworthy crypto exchange development partners with demonstrable technical competency.

Immediate Deal-Breaker Signals

One of the most effective ways to avoid errors in your startup investment is by gradually changing your capital allocation decisions, focusing first and foremost on the startup recognition of critical structural vulnerabilities. The key to spotting these engineering red flags is protecting the startup investment from unreliable technical providers.

Technical Evaluation Concerns

Start avoiding vendors if they give you a vague idea of their matching engine metrics, hide the risks involved in the third-party dependencies, or they don’t have a clear roadmap for scaling multi-tiered systems.

Product Execution Concerns

Refusal to show a completely artificial offline demo and blaming the lack of a deployment history that has been verified, or avoiding performing high-throughput load stress tests, are some of the major concerns.

Trust & Transparency Concerns

If you come across teams not showing the live platform clients, refusing independent security audits, and even masking the engineers’ leadership credentials, you should walk away from such teams.

Thus, screening for these very obvious signs of warning will allow the vendor to be eliminated from the software market. Choose transparency at all stages of the product development process as the principal feature of trustworthy development teams. And these teams should have verified production-grade experience.

10 Key Factors to Choose the Best Crypto Exchange Development Company

One has to assess the technical merits of your potential partner by focusing on these fundamental aspects of a development company.

1. Verified Blockchain Engineering Experience

Make sure the crypto exchange development company you are considering has a solid, verified track record of delivering reliable, secure, and efficient trading systems capable of handling high volumes, rather than just offering simple utility tokens or marketing websites based on Web3.

2. Ownership of Trading Engine Architecture

It is essential for your cryptocurrency exchange software developers to have full, exclusive rights to their core matching engine logic, rather than using unstable, limited third-party processing scripts.

3. Proven High-Load Scalability Capability

Look for your potential partner’s team for evidence of a well-engineered, production-ready system that can handle thousands of simultaneous order transactions without any significant issues like database lag or mismatched order results.

4. Full Custom Architecture Control

Backend ownership enabling future upgrades and scaling flexibility.  It requires complete backend code ownership from your crypto exchange software development company. This extra flexibility in the engineering will enable your in-house team to make future upgrades in scaling, additions of more trading pairs, and institutional feature implementations.

5. Compliance and Regulatory Implementation Depth

A reliable crypto exchange development company should be capable of implementing automated KYC and AML workflows, user data protection mechanisms, and compliance frameworks that align with evolving global standards such as FATF recommendations and regional regulatory requirements. This foundation helps exchanges scale across jurisdictions while reducing operational and regulatory risks.

6. Cloud-Native and Microservices Infrastructure

Industry leaders use the development approach of breaking down the system into smaller services that are isolated from each other (microservices) and packaging the whole system in Docker containers; these two techniques of software delivery guarantee continuous system availability, a high level of fault tolerance, and ease of cloud infrastructure expansion.

7. Liquidity System Engineering Capability

You’re not interested in shallow liquidity architecture, so it would be wise to dig deeper into their liquidity engineering knowledge and check how advanced they are. The ideal situation is to go beyond simple API plug-ins and create strong networks for multi-source order book aggregation with tighter spreads.

8. Real-Time Trading UX Stability

The front-end system must be able to get price update feeds through secure WebSockets in a flash; it should also keep the UI responsive at all times and not lag even when market volume and volatility are at their highest during intensive trading hours.

9. Post-Launch Engineering Support Model

Your software development company must have a post-deployment assistance program that includes routine security update patches, system enhancements, error fixing, and emergency system performance optimization support.

10. Transparent Pricing Linked to Architecture Depth

Get clear and fair pricing by partnering only with those who provide an exhaustive, detailed breakdown of all cost components, rather than charging based solely on features and without revealing the underlying technical complexity of the infrastructure.

In brief, using these strict parameters as a basis for partner selection will help you breathe a sigh of relief in the future by having maximum platform protection and commercial scalability at your disposal.

The Founder’s Final 3-Step Decision Framework

A crypto exchange founder needs to have an orderly vendor evaluation process in place. This setup first filters out the weak vendors, and then, if a vendor is capable engineering-wise, it gets confirmed before you decide to commit.

Step 1 — Remove Non-Core Engineering Vendors

Get rid of vendors that are not technically direct owners. If they are not able to lay out the system architecture explicitly, they are resellers, not building your exchange.

Step 2 — Validate Core Architecture Ownership

Only accept a vendor who can technically give, in detail, the design of the matching engine, the logic of the order flow, and the architecture of the system.

Step 3 — Verify Real Production Systems

It is a must to have an active live exchange deployment as proof. Active production systems indicate that the vendor is a builder of real platforms—not mere stylish sales decks.

Make use of this three-step structure to eliminate resellers, confirm true engineering ownership, and find the most suitable partners for long-term production success of crypto exchange development.

Common Mistakes that Lead to Exchange Failure

Don’t make critical architectural errors. Getting rid of these four technical failings will help you protect your brand reputation and save precious corporate launch capital.

Confusing UI Quality With System Capability

Don’t be fooled by a shiny interface when judging backend scaling infrastructure. Many times, great-looking fronts are disguising slow engines for matching and weak pipelines of transaction data.

Selecting Vendors Based on Low Pricing

Lower-cost solutions may limit architectural flexibility and scalability options. Very low-cost clone scripts will limit your long-term database customization options mostly. Besides, lowering initial engineering budgets always results in high technical debt and system instability.

Ignoring Load Testing and Stress Scenarios

Platforms typically fail when there is a high trading volume, not during the calm periods. By not performing thorough load testing, you reveal a few major database locking vulnerabilities that can happen during peak traffic times.

Delaying Compliance Implementation

Leaving legal identity verification until the last minute greatly increases operational risks. Early neglect of regulatory setups will not only invite heavy compliance penalties but also lead to immediate post-launch operational shutdowns.

Basically, focus on deep engineering rather than cheap surface appearances. Good solid coding will guarantee that the platform is available even through very volatile markets.

Top Crypto Exchange Development Companies and Their Real Strengths

These top crypto exchange development companies have special technical capabilities that you should consider thoroughly before making your final vendor selection.

Cryptiecraft

Cryptiecraft helps you to quickly launch your own white-label exchange. Their trading platform architecture is modular, so clients get ready-to-scale infrastructures with a high degree of customization and continuously deepening production capabilities.

Craitrix

Craitrix is capable of taking your crypto exchange centralized, decentralized, or even hybrid. They have solutions for hybrid architectures and have also gained a certain level of production scalability validation in both CEX and DeFi environments.

SoluLab

SoluLab is a team of experienced enterprise blockchain developers. As a consequence, they can provide various solutions for complex blockchain exchange architectures that are targeted at large-scale institutional and commercial deployments.

Antier Solutions

Antier Solutions is your partner if you want a crypto exchange that complies with the law. They will make sure that your exchange has a KYC/AML system and operates a token ecosystem compliant with various jurisdictions. 

Leeway Hertz

Leeway Hertz is known for its strong focus on front-end design and product engineering. They provide great-looking trading interfaces and are growing backend exchange and infrastructure development capabilities.

Look at these companies one by one and assess them based on your very own core technical requirements and compliance needs, as well as your long-term goals of scalability. Then you decide.

Conclusion

Choosing a crypto exchange development company is, at its essence, a process verification exercise, not a comparison of features. Founders who base their vendor decisions on shallow feature lists end up with fragile systems that break during actual trading. The ideal partner will not only show clear engineering responsibility but also demonstrate live market stress scalability, have top-notch security in every layer, and offer dependable infrastructure made for production; these qualities should be inherent to the system, not added as compromises later.

In 2026, the crypto exchange platforms will require, first and foremost, architectural thinking. Regulatory forces are pushing, trading volumes are soaring, and users are demanding ever more stable and reliable platforms.  Only those who have their own matching engines, can design and control their systems, and continuously operate production deployments, will be able to help exchanges grow sustainably in the long term.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. How do I verify that a crypto exchange development company is real?

Ans: Look through their portfolio to see if they have any running client platforms. Only thoroughly checking things like processing speeds, public smart contracts, and live transaction order books can be considered legitimate proofs.

Q2. What is the biggest risk when choosing a vendor?

Ans: Endangering your trading business to situations where the vendor gives you untested and unproven engines that break down and fail in moments of extreme market volatility, so your startup’s entire transaction system will be lagging and exposed to exploits.

Q3. What defines a production-grade crypto exchange?

Ans: A production-grade platform is a combination of a high-frequency matching engine, multi-layered cold wallet security architectures, automated compliance integration, and deep institutional liquidity connections.

Q4. What is the difference between demo and real exchanges?

Ans: A demo environment performs simple functionality tests with artificial offline data, while a real exchange is one that processes live, volatile transactions as well as smart contracts and changing liquidity.

Q5. How much does it cost to build a crypto exchange in 2026?

Ans: The cost to develop a Crypto Exchange depends on architecture depth, liquidity systems, compliance scope, and scalability requirements. Prices can be as low as $8,000 for standard white-label scripts and can go beyond $150,000 for trading architectures that are customized and enterprise-grade.

Q6. How long does it take to build a scalable exchange?

Ans: Depends on whether the architecture is modular, hybrid, or fully custom. Launching a white-label script that is already pre-engineered can be done in four weeks. Still, designing a custom trading ecosystem with great scalability can take from six to twelve months.

Ram Mohan MS

About the Author

Ram Mohan MS

Founder & CEO - Craitrix Technologies

Rammohan is the Founder & CEO of Craitrix Technologies, specializing in blockchain, Web3, and scalable enterprise solutions. With hands-on experience in delivering secure, high-performance digital platforms, he has guided startups and businesses through complex technology transformations. His expertise spans crypto exchange development, custom software, and digital innovation strategies. Rammohan regularly shares insights on emerging technologies, helping businesses make informed, future-ready decisions.

Ready to launch your own Blockchain venture? Start your journey with our expert team today.

Connect with Us

Let's talk about your project.

We’re here to help—share your thoughts or inquiries with us, and we’ll get back to you soon!

Person pointing
  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • North Macedonia (Северна Македонија)+389
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358
  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • North Macedonia (Северна Македонија)+389
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358
Whatsapp
Whatsapp

+91 7904514634

Teams
Microsoft Teams

@craitrix

Telegram
Telegram

@craitrix