Crypto Exchange Solutions

Crypto Exchange Security: How to Prevent Hacks and Protect Digital Assets in 2026

Aug 22, 2026 · 10 min read
In this article
Need Help?
Talk to Our Experts

A crypto exchange can be targeted through far more than its wallets. Crypto exchange security requires layered protection across user accounts, APIs, trading infrastructure, wallets, private keys, withdrawals, cloud environments, employees, and third-party services. No single feature can eliminate every hacking risk.

In 2026, attackers increasingly target credentials, privileged access, API keys, transaction-signing workflows, developer environments, software dependencies, CI/CD pipelines, and operational processes. A strong security architecture must combine access controls, preventive measures, continuous monitoring, and security testing.

This guide explains how to prevent crypto exchange hacks, covering major attack vectors, wallet and private-key protection, API and withdrawal security, transaction signing, threat monitoring, security testing, and incident response. It also explains how to evaluate meaningful security controls rather than relying on security claims alone.

Why Are Crypto Exchanges Prime Targets for Hackers?

Crypto exchanges are attractive targets because they combine valuable digital assets, large numbers of user accounts, automated transactions, internet-facing applications, privileged access, and third-party integrations. A successful compromise can affect funds, trading operations, sensitive information, or platform availability. Understanding this broad attack surface is the starting point for stronger exchange security.

What Makes a Crypto Exchange Vulnerable?

An exchange typically connects hot wallets, APIs, trading engines, withdrawal systems, cloud infrastructure, employee accounts, and external services. Each component can introduce a potential entry point. Weak authentication, excessive privileges, exposed credentials, vulnerable applications, or misconfigured infrastructure can allow an attacker to move from one compromised layer to another.

Where Can an Attacker Enter a Crypto Exchange?

The attack surface can be viewed as:

User → Application → API → Admin → Trading Engine → Wallet → Signing → Blockchain

An attacker may enter through a compromised account, vulnerable application, stolen API key, privileged administrator account, exposed infrastructure, or compromised signing workflow. Because these layers interact with each other, protecting only the wallet is not enough. A complete security strategy must address the exchange’s entire attack surface.

What Are the Most Common Crypto Exchange Attack Vectors in 2026?

Crypto exchanges face threats across multiple layers, including user accounts, APIs, wallet infrastructure, software dependencies, insider access, and transaction-signing systems. Understanding these crypto exchange attack vectors helps identify where security controls need to be applied.

Account Takeover, Phishing, and Social Engineering

Attackers can target users, administrators, and employees by stealing credentials or manipulating them into granting access. Common attack paths include:

  • Phishing and credential theft
  • Session compromise
  • Social engineering
  • Weak authentication
  • Account takeover

A compromised account becomes more dangerous when it has access to sensitive exchange functions or privileged systems.

Private-Key and Hot-Wallet Compromise

Hot wallets and private keys are high-value targets because unauthorized access can potentially result in asset movement.

Attack surfacePotential risk
Hot walletsUnauthorized asset transfers
Private keysLoss of asset control
Signing credentialsUnauthorized transactions
Custody infrastructureWallet compromise
Excessive online exposureGreater attack impact

API, Application and Infrastructure Attacks

APIs connect users and applications with important exchange functions, making crypto exchange API security an important part of the attack surface.

Common attack paths include:

  • Stolen API keys
  • Broken authorization
  • Application vulnerabilities
  • Exposed credentials
  • Cloud misconfigurations
  • Compromised infrastructure

Supply-Chain and Developer-Endpoint Attacks

An exchange can inherit risks from the software, services, and development environments used to build and operate it. Compromised dependencies, SDKs, third-party services, developer devices, CI/CD pipelines, or vendor accounts can introduce vulnerabilities before they reach production.

Insider Threats and Privileged Access Abuse

Not every attack originates outside the organization. Employees, administrators, contractors, or vendors may intentionally or accidentally misuse legitimate access to sensitive exchange systems.

Common risks include:

  • Excessive administrative privileges
  • Privileged account misuse
  • Credential sharing
  • Unauthorized data access
  • Malicious or compromised employees
  • Improper vendor access
  • Accidental exposure of sensitive information

MFA, least-privilege access, role-based permissions, activity monitoring, and separation of critical duties can reduce the potential impact of insider abuse.

Unauthorized Withdrawals and Malicious Transactions

Some attacks focus specifically on moving assets without authorization rather than compromising the entire exchange.

Withdrawal Request → Destination Address → Approval → Signing → Blockchain

Attackers may attempt to manipulate destination addresses, bypass approval controls, abuse withdrawal permissions, or compromise the transaction-signing process.

These risks make withdrawal controls and transaction signing security critical parts of exchange protection.

Exchanges with complex trading infrastructure should also ensure that their order matching engine is protected because it connects directly to core trading operations.

How to Protect a Crypto Exchange From These Attack Vectors

Preventing crypto exchange hacks requires controls matched to each attack surface. Effective crypto exchange security practices combine identity protection, wallet security, API controls, transaction safeguards, monitoring, testing, and incident response. The objective is to prevent one compromised account, application, or service from becoming a path to critical assets.

Build a Layered Crypto Exchange Security Architecture

Separate public applications, APIs, administrative systems, trading infrastructure, wallet services, and signing environments. Apply MFA, least-privilege access, role-based access control, network segmentation, privileged access management, encryption, secrets management, and zero-trust principles.

A layered architecture limits lateral movement when one component is compromised. Security requirements should be defined during the crypto exchange development process, rather than added after the platform is built.

Secure Crypto Exchange Wallets and Private Keys

Wallet and private-key protection should match the exchange’s custody model, transaction requirements, and operational risk.

ApproachPrimary purposeKey consideration
Hot walletsFrequent transactionsLimit operational balances
Cold storageLong-term reservesRestrict online access
MultisigMultiple approvalsReduces single-key dependence
MPCDistributed key controlRequires strong implementation
HSMsProtected key operationsSafeguards sensitive key operations

The goal is to reduce unnecessary online exposure while maintaining the liquidity required for legitimate transactions.

Strengthen Withdrawal, Trading and API Security

Compromised credentials should not automatically provide unrestricted access to trading or withdrawals. Crypto exchange API security should use permissions that match the actual requirements of each user, application, or administrator.

Key controls include:

  • Granular API permissions
  • Withdrawal limits
  • Address allowlisting
  • New-address withdrawal delays
  • Multi-person approval for high-value withdrawals
  • IP allowlisting where appropriate
  • API-key rotation and revocation
  • Rate limiting
  • Abnormal trading and withdrawal detection

These controls create additional barriers between account compromise and unauthorized asset movement.

Secure the Transaction Signing Process

Transaction signing requires an independent security layer because an attacker may attempt to make a malicious transaction appear legitimate.

Transaction Request → Simulation → Address Verification → Risk Check → Approval → Signing → Broadcast

For high-value transactions, exchanges can introduce independent verification, multiple approvals, transaction simulation, and restricted signing environments. This reduces the chance that a compromised application or privileged account can directly trigger an unauthorized blockchain transaction.

Secure the Exchange Software Supply Chain

Security risks can enter through dependencies, SDKs, third-party services, developer devices, CI/CD pipelines, and vendor accounts.

Important controls include:

  • Dependency monitoring
  • SDK verification
  • CI/CD access restrictions
  • Code-signing controls
  • Developer endpoint protection
  • Secrets management
  • Vendor access controls
  • Software supply-chain monitoring

Protecting production infrastructure alone is not enough when weaknesses can enter through the software delivery process.

Use Real-Time Transaction and Threat Monitoring

Preventive controls need continuous monitoring to identify suspicious activity that bypasses them.

Monitor activity across:

Accounts → APIs → Admin → Trading → Withdrawals → Wallets → Blockchain

Look for unusual login behavior, abnormal API activity, unexpected withdrawals, suspicious wallet transactions, and high-risk signing requests. Monitoring should connect detected anomalies with actions such as additional verification, transaction review, temporary restrictions, or escalation.

Conduct Continuous Security Testing and Audits

Security testing should cover the complete exchange environment, not just the customer-facing application.

Security assessmentPrimary focus
Vulnerability assessmentKnown weaknesses
Penetration testingExploitable attack paths
API security testingAuthorization and endpoint risks
Application testingLogic and application vulnerabilities
Infrastructure testingNetwork and server exposure
Threat modelingDesign-level attack scenarios
Dependency scanningThird-party software risks
Independent assessmentExternal security validation

Testing should be followed by remediation and retesting. An identified vulnerability remains a security risk until it is properly addressed.

Prepare an Incident Response and Fund-Recovery Plan

No security architecture should assume every attack will be prevented. A crypto exchange also needs a defined response process for limiting damage.

Detect → Contain → Freeze → Investigate → Recover → Communicate → Remediate

Depending on the incident, this can involve suspending affected withdrawals, isolating compromised wallets or systems, revoking credentials, tracing blockchain transactions, investigating the root cause, communicating with affected users, and restoring trusted infrastructure.

Attack vectorPrimary control
Account takeoverMFA, access controls, monitoring
Wallet compromiseMPC, multisig, HSMs, cold storage
API attacksPermissions, rate limiting, IP controls
Insider abuseLeast privilege, MFA, activity monitoring
Supply-chain attacksDependency and vendor controls
Malicious transactionsSimulation, verification, approval
Unauthorized withdrawalsLimits, allowlisting, approval workflows
Infrastructure attacksSegmentation, encryption, zero-trust controls

How to Evaluate the Security of a Crypto Exchange

Evaluating an exchange means looking beyond claims such as “bank-grade security.” Examine how the platform protects wallets, controls privileged access, authorizes withdrawals, secures APIs, monitors transactions, and validates its security controls.

Security Questions to Ask Before Launching an Exchange

Before choosing or launching an exchange, ask:

  • How are private keys stored and protected?
  • Who can access wallet and signing systems?
  • How are withdrawals approved and monitored?
  • Are MFA, admin, and API permissions properly implemented?
  • How frequently is security testing performed?
  • How are vendors, dependencies, and developer environments assessed?
  • Is there a documented incident-response plan?

Don’t Confuse Security Features With Security Assurance

Individual security features address specific risks but do not prove that an exchange is fully protected.

  • Multisig can reduce dependence on one private key, but compromised signers or approval processes may still create risk.
  • Cold storage reduces online exposure, but access controls and operational procedures remain important.
  • Encryption protects information in specific situations but does not prevent every account, application, or infrastructure attack.

The right approach is to evaluate security architecture, implementation, monitoring, and operational controls together rather than judging an exchange by its feature list.

What Proof of Reserves Can and Cannot Tell You

Proof of Reserves (PoR) can provide transparency around reported assets or reserves, but it does not demonstrate that an exchange’s applications, APIs, wallets, private keys, or infrastructure are protected from attacks.

Think of the distinction simply:

  • Proof of Reserves → Asset and reserve transparency
  • Security architecture → Protection against unauthorized access and asset movement

PoR is therefore one part of exchange evaluation, not a complete measure of security.

Why Choose Craitrix for Crypto Exchange Platform Development?

Craitrix develops crypto exchange platforms with security built into the architecture, covering wallet infrastructure, private-key protection, API controls, access management, transaction workflows, monitoring, and security testing. Instead of adding security after development, these considerations can be addressed while defining the exchange architecture, trading infrastructure, integrations, and operational workflows. This approach allows the exchange architecture, wallet infrastructure, access controls, transaction workflows, and security testing strategy to be defined around the platform’s requirements from the start.

We also provide a custom crypto exchange development, wallet integration, KYC/AML integration, liquidity and API integration, administrative controls, and ongoing maintenance. These capabilities can be aligned with the wider development process, from architecture and core development through testing, deployment, and post-launch improvements.

Planning to launch or upgrade a crypto exchange? Build security into the architecture from day one with Craitrix.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. How can I prevent a crypto exchange from being hacked?

Ans: Prevent exchange hacks with layered access controls, wallet protection, API security, transaction monitoring, continuous testing, and incident-response procedures.

Q2. What are the best crypto exchange security practices in 2026?

Ans: Key practices include MFA, zero-trust access, protected custody, withdrawal controls, API security, transaction monitoring, supply-chain protection, and continuous testing.

Q3. How do crypto exchanges protect user funds from hackers?

Ans: Exchanges protect user funds through controlled custody, cold storage, MPC or multisig, withdrawal safeguards, transaction monitoring, and restricted administrative access.

Q4. How do crypto exchanges protect private keys?

Ans: Crypto exchanges protect private keys using MPC, multisig, HSMs, cold storage, restricted access, key-management controls, and transaction approval workflows.

Q5. How can a crypto exchange prevent unauthorized withdrawals?

Ans: Use withdrawal limits, address allowlisting, approval workflows, API restrictions, transaction monitoring, MFA, and risk-based controls to reduce unauthorized withdrawals.

Q6. Can a crypto exchange be hacked with cold storage and multisig?

Ans: Yes. Cold storage and multisig reduce specific risks but cannot prevent compromised credentials, signers, interfaces, supply-chain attacks, or operational failures.

Q7. How often should a crypto exchange undergo security testing?

Ans: Use continuous monitoring, with periodic penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, dependency reviews, and independent security assessments based on risk and platform changes.

Q8. What should a crypto exchange do immediately after a hack?

Ans: Contain the breach, suspend affected withdrawals, isolate compromised systems, revoke credentials, investigate transactions, communicate clearly, recover assets, and remediate vulnerabilities.

Q9. How can I verify whether a crypto exchange is secure?

Ans: Review wallet architecture, access controls, withdrawal safeguards, API security, testing, monitoring, incident response, and independently verifiable evidence before trusting an exchange.

Q10. Does proof of reserves mean a crypto exchange is secure?

Ans: No. Proof of Reserves improves asset transparency but does not prove protection against account, API, wallet, infrastructure, or transaction attacks.

Ram Mohan MS

About the Author

Ram Mohan MS

Founder & CEO - Craitrix Technologies

Rammohan is the Founder & CEO of Craitrix Technologies, specializing in blockchain, Web3, and scalable enterprise solutions. With hands-on experience in delivering secure, high-performance digital platforms, he has guided startups and businesses through complex technology transformations. His expertise spans crypto exchange development, custom software, and digital innovation strategies. Rammohan regularly shares insights on emerging technologies, helping businesses make informed, future-ready decisions.

Ready to launch your own Blockchain venture? Start your journey with our expert team today.

Connect with Us

Let's talk about your project.

We’re here to help—share your thoughts or inquiries with us, and we’ll get back to you soon!

Person pointing
  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • North Macedonia (Северна Македонија)+389
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358
  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • North Macedonia (Северна Македонија)+389
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358
Whatsapp
Whatsapp

+91 7904514634

Teams
Microsoft Teams

@craitrix

Telegram
Telegram

@craitrix